MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1984766529 · doi:10.1080/0015587x.2012.753695

Anthropological Places, Digital Spaces, and Imaginary Scapes: Packaging a Digital Sámiland

2013· article· en· W1984766529 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueFolklore · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDigital Communication and Language
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThe ImaginaryArticulation (sociology)IndigenousIdentity (music)AestheticsSociologyLinguisticsArtPsychologyPolitical scienceEcologyPsychoanalysisPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This article, which focuses on the Sámi, the indigenous people of Fenno-Scandinavia, investigates the production of place in digital environments. Place-making practices are approached through the study of expressive culture. This article also discusses the consequences of these practices for linguistic and cultural revitalization and for the articulation of Sámi identity. Notes 1 See Kulonen, Seurujaärvi-Kari, and Pulkkinen (2005 Kulonen, U.-M., Seurujaärvi-Kari, I. and Pulkkinen, R. 2005. The Saami: A Cultural Encyclopaedia, Helsinki: Suomalaisen Kirjallisuuden Seura. [Google Scholar]) for facts about the different Sámi languages. 2 Nevertheless, ethnicity is not the sole criterion that ensures reindeer herding rights. For a discussion about the juridical aspects, see Allard (2006 Allard, Christina. 2006. Two Sides of the Coin—Rights and Duties: The Interface between Environmental Law and Saami Law based on a Comparison with Aoteoaroa/New Zealand and Canada, Luleå: Luleå University of Technology. [Google Scholar]). 3 For further discussion about the spatial conceptions of cyberspace, see, for instance, Dodge and Kitchin (2001 Dodge, Martin and Kitchin, Rob R. 2001. Mapping Cyberspace, London: Routledge. [Crossref] , [Google Scholar]). 4 http://www.ur.se/gulahalan/ (accessed 23 January 2012). 5 http://www.ur.se/cugu/ (accessed 23 January 2012). 6 http://www.samer.se/ (accessed 23 January 2012); http://minoritet.prod3.imcms.net/ (accessed 23 January 2012). Since 2000, the five official national minority languages of Sweden have been Finnish, Yiddish, Romani, Meänkieli (a Finno-Ugric language spoken at the Swedish–Finnish border, around the valley of the Torne river), and Sámi. 7 http://minoritet.prod3.imcms.net/1119 (accessed 23 January 2012). 8 http://sverigesradio.se/sida/default.aspx?programid = 3124 (accessed 23 January 2012). 9 http://sverigesradio.se/sida/gruppsida.aspx?programid = 3967&grupp = 13550 (accessed 23 January 2012). 10 http://sapmi.uit.no/ (accessed 23 January 2012). 11 http://www.samimuseum.fi/anaras/index.html (accessed 23 January 2012). 12 http://www.luondu.varjjat.org/ (accessed 23 January 2012). 13 http://www.saivu.com/ (accessed 23 January 2012). 14 http://pathwaysproject.org (accessed 23 January 2012). 15 For further discussion about the concept of authenticity, see, for instance, Bendix (1997 Bendix, Regina. 1997. In Search of Authenticity: The Formation of Folklore Studies, Madison: University of Wisconsin Press. [Google Scholar]), Cocq (2008 Cocq, Coppélie. 2008. Revoicing Sámi Narratives: North Sámi Storytelling at the Turn of the 20th Century, Umeå: Sámi dutkan, Umeå universitet. [Google Scholar], 154–56), DuBois (2006 DuBois, Thomas A. 2006. Lyric, Meaning, and Audience in the Oral Tradition of Northern Europe, Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press. [Google Scholar], 109), and Knudsen and Waade (2010 Knudsen, B. T. and Waade, A. M., eds. 2010. Re-investing Authenticity: Tourism, Place and Emotions, Bristol: Channel View. [Crossref] , [Google Scholar]). 16 A further analysis of this issue would consist of the study of Web 2.0 examples in order to approach variations in Sámi digital media produced by private web users.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.665
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it