MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1984770443 · doi:10.5539/apr.v6n5p65

About Organic Systems Origin According to Equilibrium Thermodynamic Modeles of Molecules Distribution in Interstellar Medium

2014· article· en· W1984770443 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
M. Yu. Dolomatov, Nadezhda A. Zhuravliova, Diana R. Tanatarova

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied Physics Research · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicOrigins and Evolution of Life
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMoleculeAbiogenesisInterstellar mediumSpace (punctuation)ThermodynamicsPhysicsThermodynamic equilibriumOrganic moleculesStatistical physicsChemical physicsAstrobiologyAstrophysicsComputer scienceQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Problem of an natural organic systems origin - amino acids, nucleotides and other construction elements of life and also natural hydrocarbonic systems to which oil and gas belong is actual not only with fundamental, but also from the practical point of view. We know that hydrocarbonic resources of a planet are steadily exhausted. At present there are not methods and models to calculate the resources of oil and life-related molecules in interstellar environment. In this paper is developed the mathematical model of the molecules composition distribution in the interstellar environment on thermodynamic potentials using methods of the probability theory, the mathematical and physical statistics and the equilibrium thermodynamics. Based on this model are estimated the resources of life-related molecules, amino acids and the nitrogenous bases in the interstellar medium. The possibility of the oil hydrocarbons molecules formation is shown. The given calculations confirm Sokolov’s and Hoyl’s hypotheses about the possibility of the oil hydrocarbons formation in Space. Results are confirmed by data of astrophysical supervision and space researches.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.004
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.322
Teacher spread0.289 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueApplied Physics ResearchSame topicOrigins and Evolution of LifeFrench-language works237,207