MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1984771090 · doi:10.1021/ac801890f

Direct Electrocatalytic mRNA Detection Using PNA-Nanowire Sensors

2008· article· en· W1984771090 on OpenAlexafffund
Zhichao Fang, Shana O. Kelley

Bibliographic record

VenueAnalytical Chemistry · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicAdvanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersHospital for Sick ChildrenGenome Canada
KeywordsChemistryNanowireMessenger RNANanotechnologyBiochemistryGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We report an electrochemical nucleic acids sensing system that exhibits high sensitivity and specificity when challenged with heterogeneous samples of RNA. The platform directly detects specific RNA sequences in cellular and clinical samples without any sample labeling or PCR amplification. The sensor features an electrode platform consisting of three-dimensional gold nanowires, and DNA or RNA hybridization is detected using an electrocatalytic reporter system. In this study, probes made of peptide nucleic acid (PNA) are used to detect a newly identified cancer biomarkera gene fusion recently associated with prostate cancer. The system is able to detect the fusion sequence with 100 fM sensitivity, and retains high sensitivity even in the presence of a large excess of non-complementary sequences. Moreover, the sensor is able to detect the fusion sequence in as little as 10 ng of mRNA isolated from cell lines or 100 ng total RNA from patient tissue samples. The PNA-nanowire nucleic acids sensor described is one of the first electrochemical sensors to directly detect specific mRNAs in unamplified patient samples.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.929

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations81
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnalytical ChemistrySame topicAdvanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniquesFrench-language works237,207