Free Anterolateral Thigh Flap for Reconstruction of Head and Neck Defects following Cancer Ablation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Thirty-seven consecutive free anterolateral thigh flaps in 36 patients were transferred for reconstruction of head and neck defects following cancer ablation between January of 1997 and June of 1998. The success rate was 97 percent (36 of 37), with one flap lost due to a twisted perforator. The anatomic variations and length of the vascular pedicle were investigated to obtain better knowledge of anatomy and to avoid several surgical pitfalls when it is used for head and neck reconstruction. The cutaneous perforators were always found and presented as musculocutaneous or septocutaneous perforators in this series of 37 anterolateral thigh flaps. They were classified into four types according to the perforator derivation and the direction in which it traversed the vastus lateralis muscle. In type I, vertical musculocutaneous perforators from the descending branch of the lateral circumflex femoral artery were found in 56.8 percent of cases (21 of 37), and they were 4.83 +/- 2.04 cm in length. In type II, horizontal musculocutaneous perforators from the transverse branch of the lateral circumflex femoral artery were found in 27.0 percent of cases (10 of 37), and they were 6.77 +/- 3.48 cm in length. In type III, vertical septocutaneous perforators from the descending branch of the lateral circumflex femoral artery were found in 10.8 percent of cases (4 of 37), and they were 3.60 +/- 1.47 cm in length. In type IV, horizontal septocutaneous perforators from the transverse branch of the lateral circumflex femoral artery were found in 5.4 percent of cases (2 of 37). They were 7.75 +/- 1.06 cm in length. The average length of vascular pedicle was 12.01 +/- 1.50 cm, and the arterial diameter was around 2.0 to 2.5 mm; two accompanying veins varied from 1.8 to 3.0 mm and were suitable for anastomosis with the neck vessels. Reconstruction of one-layer defect, external skin or intraoral lining, was carried out in 18 cases, through-and-through defect in 17 cases, and composite mandibular defect in two cases. With increasing knowledge of anatomy and refinements of surgical technique, the anterolateral thigh flap can be harvested safely to reconstruct complicated defects of head and neck following cancer ablation with only minimal donor-site morbidity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".