MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1984885253 · doi:10.1021/ja0383569

β-Cyclodextrin Host−Guest Complexes Probed under Thermodynamic Equilibrium:  Thermodynamics and AFM Force Spectroscopy

2004· article· en· W1984885253 on OpenAlexaff
Tommaso Auletta, Menno R. de Jong, Alart Mulder, Frank C. J. M. van Veggel, Jurriaan Huskens, David N. Reinhoudt, Shan Zou, Szczepan Zapotoczny, Holger Schönherr, G. Julius Vancsó, L. Kuipers

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Chemical Society · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicForce Microscopy Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
FundersStichting voor de Technische WetenschappenNederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk OnderzoekEuropean Commission
KeywordsChemistryForce spectroscopyThermodynamicsThermodynamic equilibriumSpectroscopyCyclodextrinAtomic force microscopyPhysical chemistryNanotechnologyMoleculeOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The rupture forces of individual host-guest complexes between beta-cyclodextrin (beta-CD) heptathioether monolayers on Au(111) and several surface-confined guests were measured in aqueous medium by single molecule force spectroscopy using an atomic force microscope. Anilyl, toluidyl, tert-butylphenyl, and adamantylthiols (0.2-1%) were immobilized in mixed monolayers with 2-mercaptoethanol on gold-coated AFM tips. For all guests and for all surface coverages, the force-displacement curves measured between the functionalized tips and monolayers of beta-CD exhibited single, as well as multiple, pull-off events. The histograms of the pull-off forces showed several maxima at equidistant forces, with force quanta characteristic for each guest of 39 +/- 15, 45 +/- 15, 89 +/- 15, and 102 +/- 15 pN, respectively. These force quanta were independent of the loading rate, indicating that, because of the fast complexation/decomplexation kinetics, the rupture forces were probed under thermodynamic equilibrium. The force values followed the same trend as the free binding energy Delta G degrees measured for model guest compounds in solution or on beta-CD monolayers, as determined by microcalorimetry and surface plasmon resonance measurements, respectively. A descriptive model was developed to correlate quantitatively the pull-off force values with the Delta G degrees of the complexes, based on the evaluation of the energy potential landscape of tip-surface interaction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations160
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Chemical SocietySame topicForce Microscopy Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207