MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1984888779 · doi:10.1049/iet-gtd.2014.0806

Simultaneous denoising and compression of power system disturbances using sparse representation on overcomplete hybrid dictionaries

2015· article· en· W1984888779 on OpenAlex
M. Sabarimalai Manikandan, Subhransu Ranjan Samantaray, Innocent Kamwa

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIET Generation Transmission & Distribution · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicImage and Signal Denoising Methods
Canadian institutionsHydro-Québec
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCompression (physics)Sparse approximationRepresentation (politics)Noise reductionPattern recognition (psychology)Computer scienceArtificial intelligencePower (physics)Electric power systemMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study introduces a novel unified framework for simultaneous denoising and compression of electric power system disturbance signals using sparse signal decomposition and reconstruction on overcomplete hybrid dictionary (OHD) matrix. In the proposed method, the power quality signal is first decomposed into deterministic sinusoidal components and non‐deterministic components using the OHD matrix, including discrete impulse dictionary ( I ), cosine dictionary ( C ), sine dictionary ( S ) and the ℓ 1 ‐norm optimisation algorithm. Then, the hard‐thresholding, uniform threshold dead‐zone quantisation, modified index coding and Huffman coding techniques are used for compression of significant detail signal samples and approximation coefficients. To justify the selection of OHD matrix, four compression methods are implemented using the decomposition techniques based on the dictionaries Ψ = [ I C S ] and Ψ = [ I C ], the wavelet transform (WT) and the discrete cosine transform (DCT). The performance of each method is tested and validated using a wide variety of typical power quality disturbance (PQD) signals taken from the IEEE‐1159‐PQE and GIM–PQE databases and generated using the Microgrid model. The results show that the method with dictionary Ψ = [ I C S ] is capable of effectively compressing the PQD signals as well as suppressing the noise components in the signals.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.742
Threshold uncertainty score0.670

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.064
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it