MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1984896043 · doi:10.1049/mnl:20065057

Direct electrodeposition of highly ordered magnetic nickel nanowires on silicon wafer

2006· article· en· W1984896043 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueMicro & Nano Letters · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicAnodic Oxide Films and Nanostructures
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceNanowireNanoporousWaferSiliconNickelElectropolishingSubstrate (aquarium)NanotechnologyLayer (electronics)OptoelectronicsMetallurgyElectrode

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Highly ordered nickel nanowire (50 and 12 nm in diameter) arrays were successfully deposited into the nanoporous alumina template film on a gold-coated silicon wafer. The electrodeposited nickel nanowires have a preferred (220) fibre texture, that is the [110] direction parallel to the wire axis. With electropolishing, nanoporous alumina template with ordered and uniform pores was prepared by anodisation. By complete removal of the barrier layer and careful control of electrodeposition procedures, nearly 100% pore filling of uniform nanowires can be directly deposited onto the Au-coated silicon substrate, therefore no pattern transfer is necessary and incorporation of these nanowires into silicon-based devices is readily possible.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.824

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.185
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it