MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1984899375 · doi:10.1063/1.2970101

A study of terahertz quantum cascade lasers: Experiment versus simulation

2008· article· en· W1984899375 on OpenAlexaff
Hua Li, Juncheng Cao, Yali Han, Xiaoyang Guo, Zhiyong Tan, Jing‐Tao Lü, H. Luo, S. R. Laframboise, H. C. Liu

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Applied Physics · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicSpectroscopy and Laser Applications
Canadian institutionsInstitute for Microstructural Sciences
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTerahertz radiationLasing thresholdCascadeLaserMonte Carlo methodQuantum cascade laserPhysicsSemiconductor laser theoryPhotomixingElectric fieldOptoelectronicsContinuous wavePhononOpticsFar-infrared laserCondensed matter physicsChemistryQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The authors present the testing method and electrical and optical characteristics of a 4.1 THz quantum cascade laser with a four-well resonant-phonon design. The mode evolution in pulsed and continuous wave modes as a function of drive current has been investigated. An ensemble Monte Carlo model is used to analyze the carrier transport and output characteristics of the device. The calculated current density, lasing domain, and lasing frequency as a function of electric field are consistent with the measured results.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.249
Threshold uncertainty score0.435

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.321
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Applied PhysicsSame topicSpectroscopy and Laser ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207