MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1985001229 · doi:10.1002/cjs.5550360112

Testing homogeneity in a mixture of von mises distributions with a structural parameter

2008· article· en· W1985001229 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Statistics · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicBayesian Methods and Mixture Models
Canadian institutionsYork UniversityUniversity of WaterlooUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsHomogeneity (statistics)von Mises yield criterionStatisticLimitingMathematicsLikelihood-ratio testMaximum likelihoodStatisticsApplied mathematicsTest statisticEstimation theoryStatistical hypothesis testingFinite element methodStructural engineeringEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The modified likelihood ratio statistic can be used to test the homogeneity in a variety of mixture models. Here, the authors propose the use of the modified and the iterative modified likelihood ratio for testing homogeneity against a two‐component von Mises mixture with a structural parameter. They derive the limiting distributions of the test statistics and propose methods to improve the accuracy of the asymptotic approximation in finite samples. Their simulations show that the tests maintain their nominal level and that they have adequate power. Data on movements of turtles are used as an illustration

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.334
Threshold uncertainty score0.447

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it