Dark septate endophytes (DSE) of the <i>Phialocephala fortinii</i> s.l. – <i>Acephala applanata</i> species complex in tree roots: classification, population biology, and ecology
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dark septate endophytes (DSE), a diverse group of ascomycetes, are dominant root colonizers in many ecosystems. The most frequent DSE in natural forest ecosystems in the Northern hemisphere belong to the Phialocephala fortinii s.l. – Acephala applanata species complex (PAC). Recently, species rank was assigned to seven cryptic species (CSP) of P. fortinii s.l.: Phialocephala fortinii s. str. C.J.K. Wang & H.E. Wilcox, Phialocephala europaea C.R. Grünig et T.N. Sieber, Phialocephala helvetica C.R. Grünig et T.N. Sieber, Phialocephala letzii C.R. Grünig et T.N. Sieber, Phialocephala subalpina C.R. Grünig et T.N. Sieber, Phialocephala turiciensis C.R. Grünig et T.N. Sieber, and Phialocephala uotolensis C.R. Grünig et T.N. Sieber. PAC species occur on all parts of the root system of trees, from mycorrhizal root tips to the stem base. Up to 80% of fine roots in forest stands can be colonized by them, and up to eight species occur sympatrically. The present work is a mixture of review and reconsideration of published work in the light of the subdivision of P. fortinii s.l. into several species. We review the current knowledge related to taxonomy, geographical distribution, population biology, and ecology of PAC species. We identified strains of P. fortinii s.l. from previously published studies to species level. The reassessment of earlier studies indicates that PAC species behave in a versatile manner along the mutualism-parasitism continuum and lifestyle designation is complicated by the use of different experimental systems. Finally we define the most promising research areas, which will contribute to elucidate the ecological role of root endophytes in general and PAC species in particular.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".