MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1985010411 · doi:10.1016/j.urolonc.2011.03.015

Commentary on “Focal laser ablation for prostate cancer followed by radical prostatectomy: Validation of focal therapy and imaging accuracy”. Lindner U, Lawrentschuk N, Weersink RA, Davidson SR, Raz O, Hlasny E, Langer DL, Gertner MR, Van der Kwast T, Haider MA, Trachtenberg J, Surgical Oncology, Urology Division, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada

2011· article· en· W1985010411 on OpenAlexaffabout
Scott E. Eggener

Bibliographic record

VenueUrologic Oncology Seminars and Original Investigations · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicProstate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsUniversity Health Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProstatectomyMedicineAblationProstate cancerLaser ablationAblation TherapyUrologyLaser therapyProstateCancerLaserInternal medicineOpticsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.069
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.052
Threshold uncertainty score0.057

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.069
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.003
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0040.004
Scholarly communication0.0020.004
Open science0.0060.002
Research integrity0.0520.054
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueUrologic Oncology Seminars and Original InvestigationsSame topicProstate Cancer Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207