MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1985108163 · doi:10.5539/ass.v9n3p202

The Great Open-minded Thinking by Deng Xiaoping and Its Contemporary Significance

2013· article· en· W1985108163 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Qingfei Zhai, Rui Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueAsian Social Science · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicChinese history and philosophy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMarxist philosophyChinaEpistemologySociologyPolitical sciencePositive economicsLawPhilosophyEconomicsPolitics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The major decision of Deng Xiaoping's Reform and Opening up is the inevitable development of history and the choice of the Chinese people. The large Open-mindedness which is the important component of Deng Xiaoping Theory is all-around, including both external opening and internal opening. It guides the great practice of China's Reform and Opening up more than 30 years, and has obtained the great achievement which attracts worldwide attention, and is a scientific theory we have to have profound knowledge and comprehensive understanding in. Deng Xiaoping large open-mindedness which is applying Marxist stand, viewpoint and method to solve specific problems, is essentially a Marxist methodology and the important spiritual wealth of Marxism, has significance for Party building and National development in the new century.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.934
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0100.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAsian Social ScienceSame topicChinese history and philosophyFrench-language works237,207