MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Metabolic Profile and Exercise Capacity Outcomes

2004· article· en· W1985123915 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Health and Mental Health
Canadian institutionsHamilton General HospitalMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineOverweightBody mass indexMetabolic syndromeInternal medicineObesityDiabetes mellitusRisk factorLipid profileCoronary artery diseasePhysical therapyCardiologyCholesterolEndocrinology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In Brief PURPOSE Obesity remains a significant health problem for cardiac rehabilitation patients. The purpose of this study was to examine the relation of overweight and obesity to cardiovascular risk factors in patients, and to compare the change in cardiovascular risk factor profiles in patients with coronary artery disease undergoing cardiac rehabilitation at a tertiary care hospital center in Ontario, Canada. METHODS Retrospective analysis of cross-sectional data for 3542 patients, ages 63 ± 11 years, stratified by body mass index (BMI), was performed. RESULTS The findings showed that 81% of the patients had a BMI exceeding 25 kg/m2, and that 35% of the patients were obese (BMI ≥30 kg/m2). After adjustment for age, sex, smoking, hypertension, diabetes, and peak power output, BMI was a significant independent predictor of a higher total cholesterol level, higher fasting blood glucose and triglyceride levels, and lower levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol. The Adult Treatment Panel III criteria were used to examine the prevalence of the metabolic syndrome for each BMI group. At baseline, 77% of the obese males in classes 2 and 3 had three or more risk factors for the metabolic syndrome, as compared with 68% of the obese females in classes 2 and 3. After 24 weeks of intervention, the outcome data for 1353 patients showed that despite no change in body weight, all the BMI groups demonstrated significant improvements in metabolic profiles and peak exercise capacity. CONCLUSIONS Cardiac rehabilitation results in significant improvement in the cardiovascular risk profile at all levels of BMI, independently of weight loss. Future studies should examine whether targeting weight loss in cardiac rehabilitation further improves outcomes and the overall cardiovascular risk profile. Obesity is a significant health problem for CR patients. The authors examined the relationship of obesity to cardiovascular risk factors. The results showed that 35% of patients (n = 3542) were obese (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2). After 24 weeks, there were significant improvements in metabolic profiles and peak exercise capacity independent of weight loss. Future studies should examine whether targeting weight loss in CR further improves outcomes and overall cardiovascular risk profile.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.130
Threshold uncertainty score0.365

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it