MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1985148348 · doi:10.1093/jis/15.2.211

Review: The Pillars of Islam: Da'a'im al-Islam of al-Qadi al-Nu'man (Volume 1) * Translated by Asaf A. A. Fyzee, revised and annotated by Ismail Kurban Husein Poonawala: The Pillars of Islam: Da'a'im al-Islam of al-Qadi al-Nu'man (Volume 1)

2004· article· en· W1985148348 on OpenAlexaff
M. A. Nadwi

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Islamic Studies · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIslamic Studies and History
Canadian institutionsCentre for Innovation Studies
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIslamVolume (thermodynamics)HistoryPhilosophyTheologyPhysicsThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Pillars of Islam: Da‘a’im al-Islam of al-Qadi al-Nu‘man (Volume 1) Translated by Asaf A. A. Fyzee revised and annotated by Ismail Kurban Husein Poonawala New Delhi Oxford University Press 2002 580 HB£35.99 019565535–4

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.027
Threshold uncertainty score0.089

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.010
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0270.011

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Islamic StudiesSame topicIslamic Studies and HistoryFrench-language works237,207