MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1985190699 · doi:10.1049/joe.2013.0219

Capacitive digital‐to‐analogue converters with least significant bit down in differential successive approximation register ADCs

2014· article· en· W1985190699 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Engineering · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAnalog and Mixed-Signal Circuit Design
Canadian institutionsThe King's UniversityCanada Research ChairsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConvertersLinearityDifferential nonlinearitySuccessive approximation ADCCapacitorSwitched capacitorElectronic engineeringIntegral nonlinearityChipCapacitive sensingCMOS8-bitElectronic circuitShapingComputer scienceEnergy (signal processing)MathematicsElectrical engineeringEngineeringVoltageTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This Letter proposes a least significant bit‐down switching scheme in the capacitive digital‐to‐analogue converters (CDACs) of successive approximation register analog‐to‐digital converter (ADC). Under the same unit capacitor, the chip area and the switching energy are halved without increasing the complexity of logic circuits. Compared with conventional CDAC, when it is applied to one of the most efficient switching schemes, V cm ‐based structure, it achieves 93% less switching energy and 75% less chip area with the same differential non linearity (DNL)/integral non linearity (INL) performance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.789
Threshold uncertainty score0.534

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.162
Teacher spread0.157 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it