Thin layer compared to direct smear in thyroid fine needle aspiration
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The efficacy of preparing thyroid fine needle aspirations (FNAs) by the thin layer as opposed to the direct smear method has not been evaluated sufficiently in a regional laboratory setting. At the Foothills Hospital (Calgary, Canada), the method of processing thyroid FNAs was changed from direct smear to thin layer in January 1996. The results of 327 patients who had direct smear from 1994 to 1995 were compared to 401 who had thin layer between 1996 and 1997. While there were no significant differences across a broad range of quality indicators, thin layer showed a trend towards a higher proportion of true benign diagnoses (31% vs 24%), a lower proportion of inadequate specimens (41% vs 50%) and, most importantly, a lower false negative rate (3% vs 9%). In conclusion, the changeover to thin layer did not compromise the interpretation of thyroid FNAs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it