MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1985315692 · doi:10.1115/1.4002023

Height Control in Laser Cladding Using Adaptive Sliding Mode Technique: Theory and Experiment

2010· article· en· W1985315692 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicLaser and Thermal Forming Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersOntario Ministry of Research and InnovationNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaOntario Ministry of Research, Innovation and Science
KeywordsCladding (metalworking)Control theory (sociology)LaserController (irrigation)Materials scienceCharge-coupled deviceProcess (computing)Process controlAdaptive controlOpticsComputer scienceMechanical engineeringEngineeringPhysicsComposite materialControl (management)Artificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A closed-loop control of the laser cladding process is desired due to difficulties encountered in depositing a layer with acceptable quality from both geometrical and metallurgical point of views. One of the main parameters to achieve the desired geometry in laser cladding process is the height of the deposited layers. In this paper, a real-time measurement and control of the clad height is presented. Due to complex nature of the process and presence of uncertainties, a robust and adaptive sliding mode control is proposed and implemented to control the clad height. The velocity of the substrate is used as a control input while the molten pool height, which is obtained using a charge-coupled device (CCD) camera and an image processing algorithm is used as a feedback signal. Stability of the controller is proven in the presence of time-varying uncertainties and the performance of the closed-loop system is validated by simulation and experiments. The experimental results are promising and show that the geometrical accuracy of the deposited layers can be improved significantly.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.055
Threshold uncertainty score0.526

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it