Factor V New Brunswick: Ala221Val associated with FV deficiency reproduced in vitro and functionally characterized
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Factor V (FV) deficiency, also known as parahemophilia, is a rare bleeding disorder. Herein we investigate the first reported missense mutation associated with FV deficiency, Ala221Val, assigned as FV New Brunswick. To elucidate the molecular pathology associated with the Ala221Val substitution, the mutation was recreated in a recombinant system together with 3 FV mutants (Ala221Gly, Glu275Gln, and Cys220Ala/Cys301Ala) designed to help explain the Ala221Val phenotype. The expression pattern was analyzed by pulse-chase experiments and an FV-specific enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), the results suggesting the Ala221Val mutation not to interfere with the synthesis or secretion. The functional properties of the recombinant FV New Brunswick were evaluated in both plasma clotting and purified systems. The Ala221Val mutation did not affect the factor Xa (FXa) cofactor function; nor did it interfere with the activated protein C (APC)-mediated down-regulation of activated FV (FVa) activity. However, FV New Brunswick demonstrated reduced stability at 37 degrees C due to an increased rate of dissociation of light and heavy chains of FVa. In conclusion, this in vitro study of FV New Brunswick suggests the Ala221Val mutation not to impair synthesis and expression of procoagulant activity, indicating overall proper folding of the mutant molecule. Rather, the Ala221Val substitution appears to interfere with the stability of the activated FVa mutant, the reduced stability possibly explaining the deficiency symptoms associated with the mutation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".