Bibliographic record
Abstract
Through chance and unfathomable lengths of time, evolution has shown remarkable creativity, yet some creatures still defy imagination. The digenetic (requires more than one host) trematodes definitely fall into that category. Childhood imagination could not provide a more bizarre life cycle than that evolved by some of these helminths that bedevil so called higher creatures. Diplostomum spathaeum illustrates that phylum with an ophthalmic twist. The life cycle of D spathaeum begins as an egg in the faeces of a piscivorous bird, such as a gull or a pelican, as a definitive and unaffected host. It is in this host that the sexual phase occurs and the adult parasite lays its eggs in the bird’s gastrointestinal tract. The excrement containing the eggs is deposited in a fresh water lake or stream. As the faeces drop to the floor of the lake or stream, perhaps on the northern Canadian shield where they are prevalent, the eggs embryonate for approximately 3 weeks and then hatch when exposed to light. The photonegative and short lived miracidia exit the eggs, find their way to a snail, often of the Lymnaea genus, and penetrate the flesh. In the snail, the miracidia penetrate the hepatopancreas and undergo metamorphosis into sporocysts …
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".