Burnout and job satisfaction among frontline child protection workers: A departmental analysis.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The present study explored the levels of burnout and job satisfaction experienced by frontline child protection practitioners and whether the department in which they worked was associated with burnout and job satisfaction. Using a review of the research, as well as quantitative and qualitative methods, this study examined the prevalence and correlates of burnout and job satisfaction and proposed interventions for addressing these issues among frontline child protection workers. A survey that collected information on levels of burnout and job satisfaction among direct service child protection workers within the generally accepted frontline departments was administered to 112 frontline child protection workers. The Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI) was used to measure burnout on three dimensions: emotional exhaustion (EE), depersonalization (DP) and personal accomplishment (PA) while job satisfaction was measured by both the single-item and full measure of the job satisfaction scale found in the Quality of Employment survey by Quinn and his colleagues. (Abstract shortened by UMI.) Paper copy at Leddy Library: Theses & Major Papers - Basement, West Bldg. / Call Number: Thesis2005 .R35. Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 44-03, page: 1234. Thesis (M.S.W.)--University of Windsor (Canada), 2005.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".