Nanoparticle encapsulation by a polymer via <i>in situ</i> polymerization in supercritical conditions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The encapsulation of aluminum nanoparticles by polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) was carried out in supercritical conditions via in situ polymerization. The aluminum particles possessed an average diameter of 43.7 nm. The presence of PVDF on the particles was validated by thermogravimetric analysis (TGA). This result was further approved by X‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), which showed high intensity peaks of fluorine and carbon on the particles after the encapsulation process, which are associated with the presence of hydrocarbon‐based PVDF. As observed by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images, the nanoparticles were uniformly coated by a polymer of a few nanometers in thickness. The results showed that there is a good consistency between the calculated thickness of the polymer coating and the results obtained by TEM. In addition, the effect of polymerization time on the kinetics of the reaction was investigated. Finally, it was found that the thickness of the polymer layer can be controlled by the duration of the encapsulation process. POLYM. ENG. SCI., 2012. © 2011 Society of Plastics Engineers
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".