MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1985369819 · doi:10.1002/sim.2403

A workflow spatial scan statistic

2006· article· en· W1985369819 on OpenAlexaff
Luiz H. Duczmal, David L. Buckeridge

Bibliographic record

VenueStatistics in Medicine · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicData-Driven Disease Surveillance
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsScan statisticWorkflowStatisticComputer scienceCompleteness (order theory)Data miningStatisticsMathematicsDatabase

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We propose a modification of the spatial scan statistic that takes account of workflow, which is the movement of individuals between home and work. The objective is to detect clusters of disease in situations where exposure occurs in the workplace, but only home address is available for analysis. In these situations, application of the usual spatial scan statistic does not account for possible differences between home and work address, thereby reducing the power of detection. We describe an extension to the usual spatial scan statistic that uses workflow data to search for disease clusters resulting from workplace exposure. We also present results from simulations that demonstrate the increased power of the workflow scan statistic over the usual scan statistic for detecting clusters arising from exposures in the workplace.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.860
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations32
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStatistics in MedicineSame topicData-Driven Disease SurveillanceFrench-language works237,207