MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1985416016 · doi:10.1021/ja0733235

Palladium-Catalyzed Cross-Coupling Reactions in One-Pot Multicatalytic Processes

2007· article· en· W1985416016 on OpenAlexaff
H. Lebel, Chehla Ladjel, Lise Bréthous

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Chemical Society · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicCatalytic C–H Functionalization Methods
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryPalladiumCatalysisAlkeneCoupling reactionCopperCombinatorial chemistryOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Palladium-catalyzed cross-coupling reactions have been investigated in multicatalytic processes to synthesize disubstituted alkenes and alkanes from carbonyl derivatives. The use of copper-catalyzed methylenation reactions is the key starting reaction to produce terminal alkenes which are not isolated, but submitted to further structure elongation. Not only is the isolation of the alkene intermediate unnecessary, but also the copper catalyst is a beneficial cocatalyst in the palladium-catalyzed cross-coupling reactions. The desired products are thus typically obtained in higher yields using this one-pot approach. We have used these processes to synthesize hydroxylated (E)-stilbenoids, which are known chemopreventive and chemotherapeutic agents, odorant-substituted indanes, and non-natural amino acids, such as homophenylalanine.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.331
Teacher spread0.301 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations91
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Chemical SocietySame topicCatalytic C–H Functionalization MethodsFrench-language works237,207