MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1985460331 · doi:10.1002/adfm.200500899

Porous Nanostructured Optical Filters Rendered Insensitive to Humidity by Vapor‐Phase Functionalization

2006· article· en· W1985460331 on OpenAlexaff
Andy C. van Popta, John J. Steele, Shufen Tsoi, Jonathan G. C. Veinot, Michael J. Brett, Jeremy C. Sit

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvanced Functional Materials · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicOptical Coatings and Gratings
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceSurface modificationContact angleHumidityRefractive indexPorosityWater vaporPhase (matter)Deposition (geology)WavelengthThin filmChemical engineeringOptoelectronicsNanotechnologyOpticsComposite materialOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Water adsorption in many porous optical coatings can cause a detrimental red‐shift in the optical properties. In this study, a porous nanostructured rugate filter is fabricated using the glancing‐angle deposition (GLAD) technique, and rendered insensitive to large changes in ambient humidity by post‐deposition vapor‐phase functionalization. A central defect mode is added to the stop band of the filter by integrating a phase shift into the sinusoidal refractive‐index profile of the film. By monitoring the wavelength of the defect mode under variable humidity conditions, a six‐times reduction in sensitivity to water vapor is observed upon functionalization with 3,3,3‐trifluoropropyltrichlorosilane. Electrical characterization and advancing aqueous contact‐angle measurements are used to verify the hydrophobic properties of the functionalized thin films.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdvanced Functional MaterialsSame topicOptical Coatings and GratingsFrench-language works237,207