Why <i>tert</i>-Butyl Alcohol Associates in Aqueous Solution but Trimethylamine-<i>N</i>-oxide Does Not
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In dilute aqueous solution, tert-butyl alcohol (TBA) tends to aggregate but trimethylamine-N-oxide (TMAO) does not. Given that both molecules have very similar geometry with hydrophobic and hydrophilic groups, it is interesting to ask why they behave so differently in aqueous solution. To explore this question, we use molecular dynamics simulations to study two models representing TBA and TMAO that differ essentially only in their electrostatic properties. It is shown that this difference is sufficient to give the different solution behavior. Furthermore, the principal difference identified is that the hydrophilic group of TMAO (the oxygen) interacts on average much more strongly with water than the corresponding group (the hydroxyl) of TBA. A hydrogen-bond analysis shows that water-TBA and water-TMAO hydrogen bonds are similar in number, but that the hydrogen-bond energy is much more negative for water-TMAO. In all likelihood, this accounts for the different behavior in dilute aqueous solution.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".