A System Architecture for Smart Sensors Integration in Avionics Applications
Bibliographic record
Abstract
With the next generation of avionics systems, more sensors and actuators will be required for an ever increasing number of functions. In this paper, we propose a system architecture based on several enhancements to the IEEE 1451 standard, granting it a wider application range, improved resource efficiency and a generic and reusable character. This architecture facilitates the integration of next generation smart sensors with a wide range of avionics data communication networks and allows the specification of generic features to be respected. In order to meet the requirements of avionics applications, this architecture that provides a design framework offers customization of features such as bandwidth, reliability, resources utilization and compatibility with different types of transducers, especially smart sensors. The resulting resource utilization and reliability are analyzed for several configurations that provide a basis for comparison. To validate the proposed architecture and the benefits it offers, we have designed and implemented a transducer network inspired by representative avionic needs. The implementation reported in this paper targets a LX45T Xilinx FPGA board. The transducers are connected to the data network through field buses based on the ARINC 825 protocol, while the backbone of the network is based on the AFDX specification. The analysis of the ensuing prototype shows an important increase in reliability that result from using the proposed architecture. We also show that this architecture enables important complexity reduction over a typical transducer network based on the same communication protocols for the same level of reliability.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".