MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1985486559 · doi:10.1109/edssc.2012.6482807

A power and area efficient 65 nm CMOS delay line ADC for on-chip voltage sensing

2012· article· en· W1985486559 on OpenAlexaff
Sida Amy Shen, Shuang Xie, Wai Tung Ng

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAnalog and Mixed-Signal Circuit Design
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCMOSLinearityResistorEffective number of bitsLeast significant bitVoltageElectrical engineeringChipDynamic rangeVery-large-scale integrationLow-power electronicsCapacitorElectronic engineeringPower (physics)Computer scienceEngineeringPhysicsPower consumption

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a 4-bit windowed delay line ADC implemented in 65 nm CMOS technology for VLSI dynamic voltage scaling power management applications. Good linearity is achieved in the proposed power and area efficient ADC without the use of resistors for compensation. The circuit performance was analyzed theoretically and verified experimentally. The measured DNL is within ±0.25 LSB and INL ±0.15 LSB. It occupies an area of 0.009 mm <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</sup> . With a sampling rate of 4 MHz, the ADC is measured to consume a power of 14 μW with ENOB of 4.1 and voltage sensing range from 0.87 V to 1.32 V.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.812
Threshold uncertainty score0.552

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAnalog and Mixed-Signal Circuit DesignFrench-language works237,207