MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1985492599 · doi:10.3130/jaabe.1.2_17

Seismic Behavior of a Newly Developed Base Isolation System for Houses

2002· article· en· W1985492599 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEarthquake and Tsunami Effects
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEarthquake shaking tableAccelerationIsolatorBase isolationDisplacement (psychology)Structural engineeringEngineeringPendulumEarthquake engineeringPeak ground accelerationSeismic isolationNonlinear systemGround motionEarthquake simulationGeotechnical engineeringGeologyMechanical engineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The good performance of seismically isolated structures during the 1995 Kobe earthquake persuaded structural engineers, isolator manufacturers and housing construction companies to undertake a cooperative research project to investigate the possibility of introducing the seismic isolation technology in Japan's private housing sector. As a part of this project, in this study, the seismic performance of a recently developed Friction Pendulum System (FPS) for houses is presented. In order to verify its behavior under recorded earthquake ground motions, 3-dimensional shaking table tests were conducted. A three-dimensional nonlinear model was used to simulate the experimentally recorded acceleration and displacement response. Experimental results showed that the FPS significantly reduced the acceleration response at both moderate and strong levels of input ground motion. The analytical model used in this study satisfactorily predicted the experimentally recorded acceleration and displacement response time histories.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.301
Threshold uncertainty score0.516

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.194
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it