MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1985502404 · doi:10.1243/09544100jaero522

Adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system-based controllers for smart material actuator modelling

2009· article· en· W1985502404 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part G Journal of Aerospace Engineering · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAeroelasticity and Vibration Control
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
Fundersnot available
KeywordsActuatorAdaptive neuro fuzzy inference systemControl theory (sociology)Neuro-fuzzyComputer scienceControl engineeringController (irrigation)Fuzzy control systemMATLABFuzzy logicEngineeringArtificial intelligenceControl (management)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An intelligent approach for smart material actuator modelling of the actuation lines in a morphing wing system is presented, based on adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference systems. Four independent neuro-fuzzy controllers are created from the experimental data using a hybrid method — a combination of back propagation and least-mean-square methods — to train the fuzzy inference systems. The controllers' objective is to correlate each set of forces and electrical currents applied on the smart material actuator to the actuator's elongation. The actuator experi-mental testing is performed for five force cases, using a variable electrical current. An integrated controller is created from four neuro-fuzzy controllers, developed with Matlab/Simulink software for electrical current increases, constant electrical current, electrical current decreases, and for null electrical current in the cooling phase of the actuator, and is then validated by comparison with the experimentally obtained data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.861
Threshold uncertainty score0.926

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.197
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it