Étudier la communication organisationnelle et santé des organisations de santé au health organizing
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dans le cadre d’une réflexion sur les organisations de santé, nous présentons les résultats d’une revue de littérature portant sur les dynamiques organisationnelles et communicationnelles qui caractérisent ces organisations. Cette thématique de recherche, qui relève de ce que nous proposons de nommer la « communication organisationnelle et santé », est définie par des problématiques particulières, ainsi que par sa portée pratique, c’est-à-dire par la volonté de comprendre les enjeux auxquels font quotidiennement face les organisations de santé et proposer des démarches et interprétations pour les adresser. En réfléchissant aux orientations de la recherche dans ce domaine et en nous basant sur une approche constitutive de la communication organisationnelle, nous proposons d’élargir la définition d’organisation de santé aux processus organisants qui en seraient constitutifs, soit le « health organizing ».
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.026 | 0.047 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.011 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.011 | 0.009 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".