MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1985561277 · doi:10.1063/1.4790405

Dimensions, lengths, and separability in finite-dimensional quantum systems

2013· article· en· W1985561277 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Mathematical Physics · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicQuantum Information and Cryptography
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMultipartiteSeparable spaceSeparable stateDimension (graph theory)Invariant (physics)Product (mathematics)Bipartite graphQuantum stateRegular polygon

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Many important sets of normalized states in a multipartite quantum system of finite dimension d, such as the set \documentclass[12pt]{minimal}\begin{document}${\cal S}$\end{document}S of all separable states, are real semialgebraic sets. We compute dimensions of many such sets in several low-dimensional systems. By using dimension arguments, we show that there exist separable states which are not convex combinations of d or less pure product states. For instance, such states exist in bipartite M⊗N systems when (M − 2)(N − 2) > 1. This solves an open problem proposed by DiVincenzo, Terhal and Thapliyal about 12 years ago. We prove that there exist a separable state ρ and a pure product state, whose mixture has smaller length than that of ρ. We show that any real \documentclass[12pt]{minimal}\begin{document}$\rho \in {\cal S}$\end{document}ρ∈S, which is invariant under all partial transpose operations, is a convex sum of real pure product states. In the case of the 2⊗N system, the number r of product states can be taken to be \documentclass[12pt]{minimal}\begin{document}$r=\mathop {\rm rank}\rho$\end{document}r= rank ρ. We also show that the general multipartite separability problem can be reduced to the case of real states. Regarding the separability problem, we propose two conjectures describing \documentclass[12pt]{minimal}\begin{document}${\cal S}$\end{document}S as a semialgebraic set, which may eventually lead to an analytic solution in some low-dimensional systems such as 2⊗4, 3⊗3, and 2⊗2⊗2.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.532
Threshold uncertainty score0.317

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Mathematical PhysicsSame topicQuantum Information and CryptographyFrench-language works237,207