Identification of biodegradation products formed by L-phenylalanine based segmented polyurethaneureas
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The degradation of novel biodegradable segmented polyurethanes was investigated with a view to determining the cleavage points within the polymer backbones targeted by the enzyme chymotrypsin. While the materials were developed with specific enzyme cleavage sites designed into the polymer chains, the nature of their degradation had not yet been determined. In this work, two segmented polyurethaneureas containing L-phenylalanine residues in the chain extender and two control polymers were subjected to degradation in the presence of chymotrypsin. Samples were collected for analysis over a time period from 1 day to 8 weeks. The degradation products from these materials were isolated using solid phase extraction and reversed phase high pressure liquid chromatography, and identified using mass and tandem mass spectrometry. Three hard segment related degradation products were identified and provide important insight into the polyurethane backbone cleavage sites. Cleavage of urea, ester and urethane bonds were observed. The results confirmed that chymotrypsin was able to cleave ester bonds adjacent to phenylalanine residues contained within the novel chain extender.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".