Clinical Response of Enhanced External Counter Pulsation (EECP) Among Bangladeshi Ischemic Heart Disease Patients
Bibliographic record
Abstract
EECP is used to stabilize the coronary circulation in patients with severe coronary artery disease when maximal medical therapy and/or invasive procedures have proven inadequate. This prospective observational study was done for a period of 12 months. 40 patients with angina and angiographically proven coronary artery disease, who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria was enrolled in this study. Among 40 enrolled patients 30 (70%) patients completed their treatment. All the patients were in between 42 to 80 years age group. All patients required sublingual nitrate before started EECP treatment. But after completion of treatment, 75% patient required no nitrates. Who completed full course, 100% were improved their angina symptoms from class II, III, IV to class I. Overall 80% patients improved their quality of life. Those completed full course of treatment 100% patients improved their quality of life. EECP Heart therapy is now world-wide accepted alternative treatment option for those patients, who are not fit for surgery or any kind of interventional procedure and those developed heart failure. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/uhj.v7i1.10205 UHJ 2011; 7(1): 19-22
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".