MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1985583858 · doi:10.1021/jo052252u

Synthesis of Sulfonium Sulfate Analogues of Disaccharides and Their Conversion to Chain-Extended Homologues of Salacinol: New Glycosidase Inhibitors

2006· article· en· W1985583858 on OpenAlexaff
Blair D. Johnston, Henrik H. Jensen, B. Mario Pinto

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Organic Chemistry · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicCarbohydrate Chemistry and Synthesis
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSulfoniumChemistryGlycoside hydrolaseMaltaseStereochemistryMonosaccharideEnzymeXyloseStereocenterGalactoseBiochemistryGlycosideArabinoseOrganic chemistryEnantioselective synthesisFermentationCatalysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Four chain extended homologues of salacinol, a naturally occurring glycosidase inhibitor, were prepared for evaluation as inhibitors of glucosidase enzymes involved in the breakdown of carbohydrates. The syntheses involved the reactions of 1,4-anhydro-2,3,5-tri-O-benzyl-4-thio-D-arabinitol with cyclic sulfate derivatives of different monosaccharides. Debenzylation of the products afforded the novel sulfonium sulfate derivatives of D-glucose, D-galactose, D-arabinose, and D-xylose that are of interest in their own right as glycosidase inhibitors. Reduction to the corresponding alditols then afforded the homologues of salacinol containing polyhydroxylated, acyclic chains of 5- and 6-carbons, differing in stereochemistry at the stereogenic centers. Three of the chain-extended homologues inhibited recombinant human maltase glucoamylase, one of the key intestinal enzymes involved in the breakdown of glucose oligosaccharides in the small intestine, with Ki values in the low micromolar range, of approximately the same magnitude as salacinol, thus providing lead candidates for the treatment of Type 2 diabetes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.867

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.190
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations69
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Organic ChemistrySame topicCarbohydrate Chemistry and SynthesisFrench-language works237,207