À la recherche d’une iconographie « incroyable » et « merveilleuse » : les panneaux décoratifs sous le Directoire
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article étudie la place et la fonction de la décoration privée sous le Directoire. Les œuvres originales des peintres Girodet, Gérard, Prud’hon, Meynier et, moins célèbres, les panneaux de Lafitte inspirés des modèles de Percier et Fontaine en forment le corpus principal. Contrairement aux idées reçues sur la rupture de la Révolution française, cette production s’inscrivit dans la tradition décorative, au point que la filiation stylistique fut tout à fait linéaire dans le quartier de la Chaussée d’Antin entre 1770 et 1800. La deuxième partie de cette étude porte, d’une part, sur les lieux d’exposition de ces panneaux : salons privés, qui fonctionnaient alors comme des lieux intermédiaires entre sphère privée et sphère publique ; et, d’autre part, sur les constantes iconographiques de ces ensembles censés relayer l’influence des « Merveilleuses » après leur exclusion de l’arène politique.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.016 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".