MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1985606679 · doi:10.1109/cicc.2010.5617421

Progress and trends in multi-Gbps optical receivers with CMOS integrated photodetectors

2010· article· en· W1985606679 on OpenAlexaff
Anthony Chan Carusone, Hemesh Yasotharan, Tony Kao

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPhotonic and Optical Devices
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhotodetectorCMOSElectronic engineeringComputer scienceEqualization (audio)Bandwidth (computing)OptoelectronicsTelecommunicationsChannel (broadcasting)Materials scienceEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

There has been significant recent progress towards the realization of multi-Gbps optical receivers fully integrated into standard CMOS processes. Although CMOS photodetectors exhibit performance inferior to discrete photodetectors, they offer the potential for a low-cost highly-integrated solution that suits growing and emerging applications in short-reach optical communication. Past work has focused on using the pn-junctions and depletion regions available in standard CMOS process flows to eliminate, minimize, or cancel the slowly diffusing photocarriers that usually limit the bandwidth of CMOS photodetectors. However, if considered simply as a form of ISI, the slowly diffusing carriers can be dealt with using the same signal processing tools in wide use for other wireline communication applications, including decision feedback equalization. A combination of spatially-modulated light detection, analog equalization, and modest decision feedback equalization appears to offer a path towards data rates in excess of 10-Gbps using integrated photodetectors. Nanoscale CMOS is particularly well suited to the implementation of such signal processing functions. Measured results of photodetectors implemented in a standard 65-nm CMOS process are presented.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPhotonic and Optical DevicesFrench-language works237,207