MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1985610935 · doi:10.1103/physrevb.67.153202

Isotherms for the liquid-gas phase transition in silicon from NPT Monte Carlo simulations

2003· article· en· W1985610935 on OpenAlexafffund
Dmitry V. Makhov, Laurent J. Lewis

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. B, Condensed matter · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicHigh-pressure geophysics and materials
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaFonds Québécois de la Recherche sur la Nature et les Technologies
KeywordsSpinodalMonte Carlo methodPhysicsSiliconAtom (system on chip)Phase transitionIsothermal processThermodynamicsPhase (matter)Condensed matter physicsStatistical physicsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Isotherms for the liquid-gas phase transition in silicon have been calculated using isothermal-isobaric (NPT) Monte Carlo simulations with atom-atom interactions described by the Stillinger-Weber potential. In order to permit high-performance Monte Carlo calculations, a procedure has been developed to compute efficiently changes in the potential energy resulting from one-atom moves; the method is applicable to the Stillinger-Weber potential and other potentials with separable three-body terms. For Stillinger-Weber silicon, the critical temperature, pressure and density have been found to be $7925\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}250\mathrm{K},$ $185\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}40\mathrm{MPa},$ and $760\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}500{\mathrm{k}\mathrm{g}/\mathrm{m}}^{3},$ respectively. From the calculated isotherms, the spinodal line for the liquid-gas phase transition has been estimated.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.589
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2003
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. B, Condensed matterSame topicHigh-pressure geophysics and materialsFrench-language works237,207