Management practices of calves in Rajnandgaon district of Chhattisgarh plain
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Data on first colostrum feeding, quantity of colostrum fed to the calf, milk provided to calves were collected from 300 farmers from rural area covering 20 villages of all 9 blocks and 100 farmers from Rajnandgaon city under urban area. The managemental practices like disbudding identification of animals and record keeping Were studied. The information was collected from respondents by a questionnaire already prepared. About 41 % rural and 45% urban fanners provide colostrum to the newly horn calf within 2 hr after birth, whereas 31 and 40% rural and urban fanners provide colostrum within 2-4 hr and remaining 28 rural and 15% urban farmers feed eolostrms 4 to 8 hr ailer the birth of calf: Significantly higher (27.66%) rural farmers allowed one quarter for calves in comparison to 14% urban farmers. All the illrmers in rural and in urban area followed suckling method of calf rearing. Significantly (P< 0.01) higher number of urban farmers practice regular deworming of calf. None of the dairy farmers in rural area and barely 7% of the urban dairy farmer followed identification procedure.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".