Perturbations in Bone Formation and Resorption in Insulin-Like Growth Factor Binding Protein-3 Transgenic Mice
Bibliographic record
Abstract
UNLABELLED: IGF-I and their binding proteins are important in bone health. Examination of BMD, osteoblast proliferation, and markers of bone resorption in transgenic mice that constitutively overexpress IGFBP-3 indicates that overexpression of IGFBP-3 increases osteoclast number and bone resorption, impairs osteoblast proliferation, and has a significant negative effect on bone formation. INTRODUCTION: Low serum insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) levels correlate with an increased risk of osteoporotic fractures. Serum IGF-I is largely bound to IGF-binding protein-3 (IGFBP-3), which can inhibit IGF-I action and enhance delivery of IGF-I to tissues. Its role in bone biology is unclear. METHODS: Bone mineral density (BMD), osteoblast proliferation, and markers of bone resorption were examined in transgenic (Tg) mice that constitutively overexpressed human IGFBP-3 cDNA driven by either the cytomegalovirus (CMV) or phosphoglycerate kinase (PGK) promoter. RESULTS: Cultured calvarial osteoblasts from Tg mice expressed the transgene and grew more slowly than cells from wild-type (Wt) mice, and the mitogenic response to IGF-I was attenuated in osteoblasts from Tg mice. Total volumetric BMD and cortical BMD, measured in the femur using peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT) were significantly reduced in both Tg mouse strains compared with Wt mice. PGKBP-3 Tg mice showed the most marked reduction in bone density. Osteocalcin levels were similar in Wt and CMVBP-3 Tg mice but were significantly reduced in PGKBP-3 Tg mice. Urinary deoxypyridinoline and osteoclast perimeter, markers of bone resorption, were significantly increased in both Tg mouse strains compared with Wt mice. Using double labeling with tetracycline, we demonstrated that pericortical and endocortical mineral apposition rate was significantly reduced in PGKBP-3 Tg mice compared with Wt mice. CONCLUSIONS: These data show that overexpression of IGFBP-3 increases osteoclast number and bone resorption, impairs osteoblast proliferation, and has a significant negative effect on bone formation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".