Wireless Mesh Network Planning Using Quantum Inspired Evolutionary Algorithm
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The latest increase in mobile data usage and emergence of new applications such as Multimedia Online Gaming (MMOG), mobile TV and streaming contents have motivated advances in wireless broadband systems. Recently, the Long-Term Evolution (LTE) technology, which is based on the Universal Mobile Telecommunications System (UMTS) specifications, joins WiMAX as a competitor to achieve increasing demands of the broadband wireless access. Careful deployment of such a network is required to fulfill the high data rate demands with minimal cost of infrastructure and comprehensive coverage of the subscribers. In this paper, a multi-objective network planning problem is defined as utilizing the minimum number of infrastructure sites (i.e. Base Stations or eNode B in UMTS systems) while maximum number of users in service. We proposed a Quantum Inspired Evolutionary Algorithm (QIEA) in order to achieve optimized solution for this problem. The QIEA can be viewed as a probabilistic evolutionary algorithm and thus it is plausible to expect a reasonably good performance in solving combinatorial optimization problems. In this algorithm, each individual is represented by a string of Q-bits, where a Q-bit is the probabilistic representation inspired by the qubit concept in the quantum computing. Computational experiments show that our algorithm is fairly efficient to different scenarios of the network planning problem and performs better than the Genetic Algorithm (GA).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".