MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1985638381 · doi:10.1063/1.1621056

General solutions of Einstein’s spherically symmetric gravitational equations with junction conditions

2003· article· en· W1985638381 on OpenAlexaff
A. Das, Andrew DeBenedictis, N. Tariq

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Mathematical Physics · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicBlack Holes and Theoretical Physics
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSchwarzschild metricPhysicsSchwarzschild radiusGravitationEinstein field equationsCircular symmetryMathematical physicsEinsteinBoundary value problemEinstein equationsGeneral relativityClassical mechanicsMathematical analysisMathematicsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Einstein’s spherically symmetric interior gravitational equations are investigated. Following Synge’s procedure, the most general solution of the equations is furnished in case T11 and T44 are prescribed. The existence of a total mass function, M(r,t), is rigorously proved. Under suitable restrictions on the total mass function, the Schwarzschild mass M(r,t)=m, implicitly defines the boundary of the spherical body as r=B(t). Both Synge’s junction conditions as well as the continuity of the second fundamental form are examined and solved in a general manner. The weak energy conditions for an arbitrary boost are also considered. The most general solution of the spherically symmetric anisotropic fluid model satisfying both junction conditions is furnished. In the final section, various exotic solutions are explored using the developed scheme including gravitational instantons, interior T-domains, and D-dimensional generalizations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.921
Threshold uncertainty score0.441

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Mathematical PhysicsSame topicBlack Holes and Theoretical PhysicsFrench-language works237,207