A Modified Q-Learning Algorithm for Multi-Robot Decision Making
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper presents a modified distributed Q-learning algorithm termed the Sequential Q-learning algorithm with Kalman Filtering (SQKF), for multi-robot decision making. While Q-learning is employed commonly in the multi-robot domain to support robot operation in dynamic and unknown environments, it also faces many challenges. It is questionable to scale the conventional single-agent Q-learning algorithm into the multi-robot domain because such an extension violates the Markov assumption on which the algorithm is based on. The empirical results show that it can confuse the robots and render them unable to learn a good cooperative policy due to incorrect credit assignment among robots and also make a robot incapable of observing the actions of other robots in the same environment. In this paper, a modified Q-learning algorithm termed the Sequential Q-learning Algorithm with Kalman Filtering (SQKF), which is suitable for multi-robot decision-making, is developed. The basic characteristics of the SQKF algorithm are: (1) the learning process is not parallel but sequential, i.e. the robots will not make decisions simultaneously and instead, they will learn and make decisions according to a predefined sequence; (2) a robot will not update its Q values with observed global rewards and instead, it will employ a specific Kalman filter to extract its real local reward from the global reward thereby updating its Q-table with this local reward. The new SQKF algorithm is intended to solve two problems in multi-robot Q-learning: Credit assignment and Behavior conflicts. The detailed procedure of the SQKF algorithm is presented and its application is illustrated. Empirical results show that the algorithm has better performance than the conventional single-agent Q-learning algorithm or the Team Q-learning algorithm in the multi-robot domain.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".