Research on Ethnic Eco-ethics and Eco-civilization’s Construction in Chinese Ethnic Regions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Eco-civilization is the integral product of material achievement, spiritual achievement and regulations. It’s the cultural & ethical manifestation of the harmonic coexistence of humans & nature, balanced development, sustainable prosperity. The key ideology is the harmony and equality between nature and humans, the co-existence of multi-species and the re-production of resources. The nature ideology of integral harmony of the Chinese minority nations, and their ideology of equality of admiring life and the ideology of production of simple circulation are identical to the central ideology of eco-civilization. It reflects mankind’s pursuit for a natural and harmonious ecology. And it plays a positive role in the construction of ecological civilization. To some extent the ecological ethics of the minorities is very important to protect the natural ecological environment, and promote the continuous and harmonic development of the ethnic regions. In this paper the method to construct the eco-civilization in Chinese ethnic regions are explained, such as the development of the eco-ethics of the minorities, and educate the sense of eco-citizen, perfection of the policies and regulations to protect the ecological environment of the ethnic regions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".