MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1985657462 · doi:10.1103/physreva.65.045201

Estimation of the pulse width of x-ray emission from Xe clusters excited by a subpicosecond intense Ti:sapphire laser pulse

2002· article· en· W1985657462 on OpenAlexfundno aff
T. Shiraishi, M. Mori, K. Kondo

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review A · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicLaser-Matter Interactions and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of TsukubaRyerson University
KeywordsPhysicsAtomic physicsExcited statePulse (music)LaserEnergy (signal processing)Photon energySapphirePhotonXenonX-rayOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The pulse width of $\mathrm{Xe}(M)$ emission, whose photon energy is $\ensuremath{\sim}1\mathrm{keV},$ from Xe clusters excited by a subpicosecond intense laser pulse was estimated to be shorter than 100 ps. While that of $\mathrm{Xe}(N)$ emission, whose photon energy is $\ensuremath{\sim}100\mathrm{eV},$ was longer than 1 ns. The theoretical estimation of radiative recombination rates suggests that the observed keV x ray is a prompt x ray.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.712
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review ASame topicLaser-Matter Interactions and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207