MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1985663110 · doi:10.4161/cc.4.6.1725

Disruption of p53 by the Viral oncoprotein HPV16-E6 does not Deregulate Chromosomal Homologous Recombination in a Transcriptional Interference-Free Assay System

2005· article· en· W1985663110 on OpenAlexaff
Jean-François Lemelin, Christine Abaji, Isabelle Cousineau, Abdellah Belmaaza

Bibliographic record

VenueCell Cycle · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicDNA Repair Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyHomologous recombinationSister chromatidsRAD51ChromatinTranscription (linguistics)Homologous chromosomeEctopic expressionGeneticsGenome instabilityGeneDNAMolecular biologyCell biologyDNA damageChromosome

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In addition to its well established role in the maintenance of genome integrity by regulating transcription of genes involved in cell cycle arrest and programmed cell death, the tumour suppressor p53 has also been shown to inhibit spontaneous chromosomal homologous recombination (HR) between adjacent transcription units, raising the possibility that p53 may prevent chromosomal rearrangements by suppressing HR between repetitive DNA elements (ectopic HR). Consistent with its role in the maintenance of genome integrity is that p53 does not suppress HR between homologous chromosomes (allelic HR) or identical sister chromatids, raising the question of how p53 discriminates between ectopic and allelic HR events. Here, we report that disruption of human p53 by the viral oncoprotein HPV16-E6 does not result in increased rates of chromosomal HR between adjacent DNA repeats in a transcriptional interference-free assay system in which a HR reporter gene can escape transcription repression. These results argue against a direct role for p53 in the regulation of HR mechanisms, imply that HR assay systems may be important determinants of the outcome, and suggest that p53 may suppress ectopic HR through its known ability to repress transcription and alter chromatin structure.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.422

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCell CycleSame topicDNA Repair MechanismsFrench-language works237,207