Interactions Between Vertical Structures in Waves
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper presents experimental and theoretical results obtained during the hydrodynamic study of a multi-cylinder system. The main focus of the study was to quantify hydrodynamic interactions between heaving vertical cylinders of a conceptual wave energy conversion system. Several identical circular cylinders representing platforms in an energy conversion system and a parabolic shaped wave reflector were tested in a wave flume tank. Wave heaving forces, radiation and diffraction effects were studied experimentally and numerically. The theoretical calculations were carried out for hydrodynamic coefficients, the radiation and diffraction effect analysis. Experimental results for multi-cylinders were compared with the numerical solutions by a panel-free method in the frequency domain. One main objective of the experimental tests was to calibrate the experimental set up, obtain validation data for numerical calculations. The diffraction studies showed that the hydrodynamic interactions could be constructive or destructive for heave wave forces. The positive magnification of the wave exciting force can be significant if a parabolic shaped reflector is used. It was observed that the wave force magnification and the wave energy absorption depend on incoming wavelength, and the cylinder to wavelength ratio. It has been found in the radiation tests that heave added mass and damping coefficients compare well with the calculations based on potential flow calculations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it