Peripheral nerve function and symptom distress during biotherapy for malignant melanoma
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Studies of biotherapy-induced physiological changes are few, and systematic monitoring for neurotoxic effects are lacking. The purpose of this exploratory pilot study was to determine the change in peripheral nerve function and symptom distress during treatment with biotherapy for malignant melanoma. A convenience sample of 11 participants with malignant melanoma receiving interferon-alpha had measures of peripheral nerve function measured at baseline, four and 12 weeks of treatment. Data were analyzed using plots and regression slopes to determine change over time in sensation, gait/balance, vision, hearing, vibratory sense, muscle strength, deep tendon reflexes, blood pressure, and symptom distress. Declines in hearing, sensation, vibration, and muscle strength were found. Changes in visual acuity, and orthostatic blood pressure were noted, while gait/balance remained stable. Additionally, neuropathy symptoms were associated with symptom distress. The characterization of such changes can increase our understanding of the nature of the physiological effects associated with high-dose biotherapy treatment and aid clinicians to better prepare patients for anticipated changes in function and subsequent lifestyle adjustments. These findings can be used to provide information in a larger study of this phenomenon regarding important outcomes and measurement time-points of therapy-induced neuropathy and decreasing symptom distress in patients receiving cancer treatment with biologic agents.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".