Bibliographic record
Abstract
Épisode emblématique d'une histoire-bataille peu prisée dans la deuxième moitié du XX e siècle, la guerre de Sept Ans suscite depuis quelques années un regain d'intérêt (Fred Anderson, Crucible of War.The Seven Years' War and the Fate of Empire in British North America, 1754-1766, Londres, Faber and Faber, 2000, XXV-862 p. ; Stephen Brumwell, Redcoats.The British Soldier and War in the Americas, 1755-1763, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2002, X-349 p. ; Christian Buchet, La lutte pour l'espace caraïbe et la façade atlantique de l'Amérique centrale et du Sud (1672-1763), Paris, Librairie de l'Inde, 1991, 2 vols., et, du même auteur, Marine, économie et société.un exemple d'interaction : l'avitaillement de la Royal Navy durant la guerre de Sept Ans, Paris, Champion, 1999, 433 p. ; Edmond Dziembowski, Un nouveau patriotisme français, 1750-1770.La France face à la puissance anglaise à l'époque de la guerre de Sept Ans, Oxford, Voltaire Foundation, 1998, 566 p.).À quelques mois d'intervalle viennent de paraître les livres de William M. Fowler et de Fred Anderson consacrés au versant nord-américain du conflit (William M. Fowler, Empires at War : The French and Indian War and the Struggle for North America, 1754-1763, New York, Walker & Company, 2005, 332 p. ; Fred Anderson, The War that Made America.A Short History of the French and Indian War, New York, Viking, 2005, XXV-293 p.) et un ouvrage qui s'intéresse à la marine française pendant les hostilités.Son auteur, Jonathan R. Dull, était tout désigné pour mener à bien cette entreprise.Saluée à sa sortie, son étude, The French Navy and American Independence : a Study of Arms and Diplomacy, 1774-1787 (Princeton, N. J. Princeton University Press, 1975, XV-437 p.) donnait une fraîcheur bienvenue à la question de la participation française à la guerre d'Indépendance américaine.Examiné sous l'angle historiographique, The French Navy The French Navy and the Seven Years' War Annales historiques
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.012 | 0.009 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".