MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1985752685 · doi:10.1103/physreva.73.022721

Nuclear relaxation of<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mmultiscripts><mml:mi>He</mml:mi><mml:none/><mml:none/><mml:mprescripts/><mml:none/><mml:mn>3</mml:mn></mml:mmultiscripts></mml:mrow></mml:math>in the presence of<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>NO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math>

2006· article· lv· W1985752685 on OpenAlexafffund
G. Archibald, Elana Brief, Chao Lei, T. Pausak, M. E. Hayden

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review A · 2006
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAtomic and Subatomic Physics Research
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsPhysicsParamagnetismRelaxation (psychology)Nuclear magnetic resonanceCondensed matter physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

By virtue of the fact that its low-lying $^{2}\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Pi}}_{3∕2}$ state is paramagnetic, nitric oxide $(\mathrm{NO})$ can be an effective agent for inducing nuclear spin relaxation during isolated binary collisions with other species. At the same time, the strong coupling between the electronic angular momentum and the internuclear axis of this particular molecule leads to a situation in which its effective magnetic moment depends critically on molecular motions that take place on the time scale of the collision. Here we present the results of an investigation in which the NMR-detected longitudinal nuclear relaxation rate ${T}_{1}^{\ensuremath{-}1}$ of room temperature $^{3}\mathrm{He}$ gas adulterated with $\mathrm{NO}$ was measured as a function of $\mathrm{NO}$ density $([\mathrm{NO}])$ in two different magnetic fields. We find ${T}_{1}^{\ensuremath{-}1}=0.0502(3)[\mathrm{NO}]\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}{\mathrm{s}}^{\ensuremath{-}1}$ at $1.50\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\mathrm{T}$, and ${T}_{1}^{\ensuremath{-}1}=0.0506(3)[\mathrm{NO}]\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}{\mathrm{s}}^{\ensuremath{-}1}$ at $2.35\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\mathrm{T}$, where $[\mathrm{NO}]$ is expressed in amagat. Under these conditions approximately two-thirds of the $\mathrm{NO}$ molecules occupy the diamagnetic $^{2}\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Pi}}_{1∕2}$ ground state and one-third occupy the paramagnetic $^{2}\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Pi}}_{3∕2}$ state. Our data can be understood in terms of a semiclassical treatment of collision dynamics that involves the paramagnetic moment autocorrelation function.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.105
Threshold uncertainty score0.350

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1050.029

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review ASame topicAtomic and Subatomic Physics ResearchFrench-language works237,207