Bibliographic record
Abstract
Au cours des cinquante dernières années, la relation soviéto- puis russo-atlantique a profondément évolué. Se concentrant sur la période de l’après-guerre froide, cet article soutient que les récentes années ont permis l’émergence d’une culture commune de sécurité entre la Russie et la communauté atlantique. En se fondant sur un cadre théorique constructiviste, il y est argumenté que depuis la fin de la guerre froide, un certain nombre de représentations sociales communes ont émergé sur les questions de sécurité. Si la transposition de ces idées en actes s’est parfois révélée difficile dans la décennie 1989-1999, il apparaît qu’au cours des dernières années, un système de sens de plus en plus dense a été partagé concernant autant la nature des menaces que doivent affronter la Russie et la communauté atlantique que les solutions à mettre en oeuvre pour y pallier.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".